 Back to Search Back to Results |
| ID no. of Reference | BETA bibid 8641 |
| Format | carta. referencia. fichero electrónico |
| Author | Mario Cossío Olavide |
| Title | Carta (correo electrónico) |
| Date / Location | 2021-08-27: |
| Note | I’m preparing an edition of the Lucidario (not Sancho IV’s) contained in a manuscript of the Biblioteca Marqués de Valdecilla,
and I’m trying to quote Philobiblon, but it turns out that the entry for the work is wrong. I’m wondering if it would be possible
to correct this? Technical details: BETA texid 1242 corresponds to the Lucidario sponsored by Sancho IV. However, one of the witnesses listed is not of this royal Lucidario, but rather of a somewhat faithful translation of Honorius of Autum’s Elucidarium (cnum 2204), completely unrelated to Sancho’s work. Since they are different works, I’m guessing this is just a mistake, and each one should have its own textid. About the titles, the incipit of cnum 2204 also uses the title Lucidario (En el nombre de Dios e de santa María quiérovos contar de un libro que fue trasladado de latín en romance. Este libro es llamado por nombre Lucidario. , fol. 1r). To avoid confusions, my edition is calling it Lucidario romanceado, a title that you can use for Philobiblon, if you like. |
| Source of Data for Works | texid 13664 Honoré d' Autun, [Lucidario romanceado] (tr. Desconocido), traducido 1441 ca. - 1460 ca. ad quem |
| Record Status |
Created 2021-08-27 Updated 2023-08-13 |